Why did Cisco fall after beating earnings?

Cisco beat on both revenue and EPS, but guided gross margins to 65–66% against the roughly 68% analysts expected. Memory chip costs, pushed up by AI demand, are squeezing a networking business that cannot pass them through quickly. Revenue was growing while profitability was not, and the stock fell 11%.

Why did Vertiv rise on the same day it reported?

Vertiv guided 2026 EPS to $6.02 against an expected $5.33, reported orders up 252% year over year, and carried a $15 billion backlog. It is expanding margins into rising demand rather than defending them, and the stock rose 24% to all-time highs.

What does position in the AI stack mean for a company?

It is the difference between selling something AI requires and something AI could commoditise. Vertiv supplies the cooling and power that GPUs cannot run without, which gives it pricing power. Cisco sells networking equipment and sits between hyperscaler buyers and constrained memory suppliers.

Why are software stocks falling even when they beat earnings?

Markets are pricing the risk that AI agents replace seat-based subscription pricing, a model relied on for two decades. Palantir had beaten estimates for thirteen consecutive quarters and its stock was still down over the year, so the concern is the pricing model rather than any single quarter.

Is money leaving the AI trade?

No, it is moving within it. Hyperscalers still plan more than $500 billion of cumulative AI infrastructure spending, and that capital is rotating toward hardware such as data-centre cooling, power and grid equipment while software multiples compress. Money flows to what AI needs rather than what AI might replace.

Back to posts

Cisco with a red minus 11% badge and Vertiv with a green plus 24% badge across a rising chart

Market Analysis

8 min read

Hardware is Eating Software: What the Cisco vs Vertiv Divergence Tells Us About 2026

Both Companies Beat Earnings. One Dropped 11%. The Other Ripped 24%.

Yashika Arora

Market Analyst

Feb 17, 2026

Cisco Systems reported earnings that beat analyst expectations on both revenue and EPS. The stock crashed 11%, its worst day since 2020.

On the same day, Vertiv Holdings also beat earnings. The stock exploded 24% to all-time highs.

Both companies operate in AI infrastructure.
Both beat estimates.
Both raised guidance.

Yet they moved 35 percentage points apart in a single session.

Understanding why is the key to navigating markets in 2026.

The Numbers Don’t Lie (But They Don’t Tell the Whole Story)

Let’s start with what both companies reported.

Cisco – Q2 2026 Results

Revenue: $15.3B (Expected $15.1B) — Beat
EPS: $1.04 (Expected $1.02) — Beat
AI Infrastructure Orders: $2.1B — Strong
Gross Margin Guidance: 65–66% (Expected ~68%) — Miss

Vertiv – Q4 2025 Results

Revenue: $2.88B (Expected $2.88B) — Met
EPS: $1.36 (Expected $1.30) — Beat
Orders YoY: +252% — Explosive
2026 EPS Guidance: $6.02 (Expected $5.33) — Crushed expectations

On the surface, Cisco’s report looks solid:

Revenue growth of 10% year-over-year
Product orders up 18%
Raised full-year guidance

But the market saw something else entirely.

The Real Story: Margin Compression vs. Pricing Power

The difference between these two stocks comes down to a single word:

Margins.

Cisco guided gross margins to 65–66%. Analysts wanted closer to 68%.

That 2–3 percentage point gap might seem small, but it represents billions of dollars in lost profit potential — and reveals a structural problem.

The Culprit: Memory Chip Prices

AI infrastructure requires massive amounts of memory. Demand from hyperscalers has driven prices through the roof.

Cisco’s networking equipment depends on these chips.
They can’t pass rising costs through fast enough.

Revenue is growing.
But profits are getting squeezed.

Vertiv tells a completely different story.

Backlog hit $15 billion
Orders grew 252% YoY
2026 EPS guidance beat estimates by 13%

Vertiv is expanding margins while demand explodes.

Why the difference?

Vertiv has pricing power.
Cisco doesn’t.

Where You Sit in the AI Stack Matters

This divergence reveals a crucial truth about the AI trade in 2026:

It’s not enough to be “in AI.”
Where you sit in the AI stack determines whether you capture value — or get squeezed.

Cisco’s Position

Cisco sells networking equipment — routers and switches, the “pipes” that move data.

This business is increasingly commoditized.

They’re squeezed between:

Hyperscalers with enormous bargaining power
Memory suppliers with limited capacity

Vertiv’s Position

Vertiv builds the physical infrastructure that keeps AI data centers running:

Cooling systems
Power management
Thermal solutions

You literally cannot run GPUs without keeping them cool.

There is no substitute.
Demand is insatiable.

One company is fighting margin compression.
The other is riding a demand wave with pricing power intact.

The Bigger Picture: The SaaSpocalypse

The Cisco/Vertiv divergence is part of a much larger story playing out across markets.

Software stocks are experiencing their worst selloff since 2022.

Since October 2025:

Oracle (ORCL): -50%
ServiceNow (NOW): -40%
AppLovin (APP): -40%
Palantir (PLTR): -23% YTD
Salesforce (CRM): -26%
Software ETF (IGV): -20% YTD

Here’s the shocking part:

Many of these companies are beating earnings.

Palantir has beaten estimates for 13 consecutive quarters — and the stock is still down 23% this year.

Beating numbers doesn’t matter anymore.

The market is pricing in something else.

What Changed: The AI Agent Threat

Markets are suddenly terrified that AI agents will replace seat-based SaaS models.

Think about it:

Why pay $150 per user per month when an AI agent might do the same job?

The entire SaaS pricing model — relied upon for two decades — is under existential threat.

The Result:

IPOs are frozen
M&A activity is dead
Liftoff Mobile pulled its IPO citing “unstable market conditions”

Translation:

Software multiples are in freefall — and nobody knows where the floor is.

The Great Rotation: From Software to Hardware

Here’s the key:

AI spending isn’t slowing down.

Hyperscalers are planning $500+ billion in cumulative AI infrastructure spend.

The money isn’t leaving the AI trade.
It’s moving within it.

While Software Gets Crushed…

Hardware infrastructure is ripping:

Vertiv (VRT): +35% YTD — Data center cooling & power
GE Vernova (GEV): +22% YTD — Power & grid
Eaton (ETN): +18% YTD — Power management
Caterpillar (CAT): +15% YTD — Infrastructure

The pattern is clear:

Money flows to what AI needs — not what AI might replace.

What This Means for Your Portfolio

If you're invested in the AI theme, here’s what this divergence tells us:

1. Beating Earnings Isn’t Enough

Markets are forward-looking. Margin pressure gets punished — even with strong revenue growth.

2. Position in the Stack Matters

Infrastructure wins. Potentially replaceable software loses.

3. Pricing Power Is Everything

Companies that can pass costs through thrive. Those that can’t get squeezed.

4. Watch the Backlog

Vertiv’s $15B backlog signaled multi-year growth confidence. Cisco’s margin guide raised sustainability concerns.

Stop Reading Headlines. Start Seeing What Moves Stocks.

The Cisco vs. Vertiv divergence wasn’t random.

The margin story was visible before the market opened — if you knew where to look.

HeyTheo helps you see what’s actually driving stocks — not just what headlines say.

When two companies in the same sector move 35% apart on earnings, there’s always a reason buried in the data.

Try HeyTheo free at heytheo.io — No credit card required.

The Bottom Line

We’re in the middle of a historic rotation.

The AI trade isn’t one trade anymore. It’s fragmenting into winners and losers based on value chain positioning.

Software that AI might replace is getting crushed.
Hardware that AI requires is soaring.

And companies stuck in the middle — like Cisco — are learning:

Growth without profitability isn’t rewarded.

The market is telling you something.

The question is whether you’re listening.

Hardware is eating software.
Position accordingly.